Camshaft Timing

I found out recently that Volvo was generous enough to include adjustable camshaft gears on both the intake and exhaust camshafts in my car. Realizing that I really don’t know a whole lot about how the valve timing, I did some research on the matter. I’m not going to go into things like lift, duration, and cam profile too much today, and wait until I understand how all the factors interact well enough to write about it.

To set things straight, you don’t really gain or lose power when you change the valve timing, unless you change it so far away from the “optimal” spot that the engine can’t breathe properly.

Most modern engines have two camshafts, one for the intake and one for the exhaust, and they can be adjusted independently. This setup makes things pretty straightforward:

Adjust the intake to put the power band where you want it. Advancing the timing will “move” the torque lower in the RPM band, to make less peak horsepower, but greater power when in the low end to midrange. Retarding the timing will do the opposite, and will generate more peak horsepower, but at the expense of power in the low end.

Changing the exhaust camshaft will do the same thing to a lessor extent, but changing the timing between the exhaust and intake changes the overlap. For this part, I’m going to assume that you have a turbocharged car, as it significantly affects how much overlap is desirable.

Less overlap (advance the exhaust more than the intake) improve how well the cylinder fills with air in the upper RPM range and/or at high boost. It can also smooth idle some, depending on how it was configured before. One serious downside is that it raises the engine RPM needed to generate boost.

More overlap increases the amount of exhaust gas recirculation which reduces power a bit, but also lowers the temperatures, allowing for more aggressive ignition timing. Too much overlap creates an over-scavenging condition where a portion of the intake gasses flow right through the cylinder and out the exhaust to create a lean condition which would increase cylinder temperature. Alternately, under high load, the exhaust back pressure is much higher than the boost pressure due to the inefficiencies of the turbocharger, and the exhaust flows back into the cylinder.

All in all, overlap is a bad thing for an engine with forced induction, but if you’re messing around with it, experiment to see what gives you the best compromise between low end and high end power, fuel economy and smoothness. If there was a dyno I could use to test out a bunch of things, I would show how the shape of the power curve changes with different camshaft timing setups, but unfortunately, like many other things, that will have to wait a while.

I’ll be back with a part two of this article sometime in the future, so stay tuned!

November 14th, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Even More Blogs I Read

It is a beautiful day when I stumble upon some new Rally related blogs (especially since I get to share them with you). Here are some (links open in new window):

  • Rally Buzz - keeps me up to date on European Rally things like the little old WRC (and some American events). I stumbled upon this gem through a blog rankings site. It is quite prolific and very well done.
  • The STi Blog - while it is not updated daily and is not solely Rally related it has some interesting pieces of information regarding Subaru and their famous STi brand. 
  • The F1 & WRC Blog - a blog about my two favorite racing leagues.

I like new blogs and if you know of any please please let me know (I could done use some more learnings. I’d appreciate it kindly.) Comment/Email.

November 13th, 2008 | 1 Comment

Sebastian Loeb Did It Again

Because of WRC Japan Loeb finalized his place as World Rally Champion for 2008!

Many congratulations are in order for, what some consider,  the best Rallyer of all time. This is his fifth championship win…in a row. He came close to winning in 2003 to make it 6 but was beat out by one of my favorites: Petter Solberg. 

What still has to be determined with the upcoming Rally Great Britain is who will come out on top in the Manufacturer’s Championship? Loeb’s Citroen or Hirvonen’s BP Ford? Being American I must root for…you were thinking Ford because it is American right? WRONG! Ford because it is the underdog in the competition. American’s always love the underdog, and Ford is behind in the standings (plus they have to go up against Loeb who will be competiting for the Manufacturer’s Championship). 

Rally Great Britain starts on December 5th and is the final round of the WRC this season. One famous person from the motorcycling world who will continue his push into the WRC is, you guessed it…Wait! You thought I was going to say Travis Pastrana because I’m American didn’t you? WRONG! Valentino Rossi will be taking a go at the WRC once again. He has competed in the WRC before (against the likes of Colin McRae) and has had some good showings. ‘The Doctor’ is just one more reason to watch Rally Great Britain.

SO GET EXCITED, there is still much to be won in the WRC.

November 11th, 2008 | Leave a Comment

WRC Japan Results

Something slightly different this time around! Hirvonen stayed in first place from the start to the final stage of the rally. This bumps his overall score up to 102. Latvala came very close to taking the lead by the 25th stage, but stayed in second place. Loeb, the current points leader at 112, took third.

Hirvonen is catching up to Loeb, however, with one race left, there is no way that Hirvonen can pass Loeb to take the lead, so congratulations to Loeb for being the only one to win 5 championships! So, the battle is going to be for the 4th place position between Latvala and Atkinson, both with 50 points, and potentially 3rd, currently held by Sordo with a 9 point lead over 4th and 5th.

As always, WRC.com has their own highlights video that sums it up pretty well:

I also found a video of Solberg driving the shakedown run in the stadium. The concrete floor looks like a lot of fun to drive on! Quick warning, it’s much louder than the previous video.

November 6th, 2008 | Leave a Comment

NASA: Rally New York 2008

NASA’s championship rally was this weekend in the towns of Callicoon, Wawarsing, Narrowsburg and Walton, NY. Only the top racers from each class in the USRC (NASA) were invited for the Halloween event. Unfortunately a five hour drive from Rochester was a bit prohibitive for me and Mark. 

Anyhoo, a deserving couple of Kris and Christine Marciniak won their class (Production 2WD). We’ve mentioned their blog on here before as inspiration for TwoGuysRally. Either way, congrats are in order for them. Here is a video of them tearing it up: (Link for you RSS Peeps)

While Kris and Christine won their class they came in 7th overall behind 6 AWD cars. First went to Seamus Burke/Eddie Fries. Second went to Joseph Burke/Ole Holter and third went to Brian Scott/John Dillon. Congrats to them.

That wraps up the year for US Rally (RA and USRC), now hopefully those class winners can get some more sponsor money and fully prep those cars for next season. Congrats to all those who competed!

November 5th, 2008 | 1 Comment

To those in the USA

Go vote!

—- 11:46 PM EST (an update)—–

So Obama is being projected as the next President of the United States of America. Congrats are in order to him. Both PA and VA voted for Obama, which happen to be our home states (NY is where we go to school). So do we get some sort of prize for that? That would be nice.

I wonder what four years of Obama will be like. We shall see!

November 4th, 2008 | 1 Comment

Movies and Car Brakes

I watch movies occasionally and I’ve just noticed something. Cars in movies either have the worst brakes or some of the highest performance brakes. They squeal constantly, or at least they do when coming to stops in frame. I get that it is a formalist approach (rather than realist), but I don’t think adding a brake squeal sound helps the viewer understand a car is stopping. 

This happens in most movies and shows, even the nicest of cars with the richest of owners have squealing brakes (whose owners would probably not tolerate an annoyance like that). Just now while writing this post up I am watching an episode of Californication and as Hank stops his older Porsche the brakes squeal. While it might be understandable that his car would have squealing brakes (he does not take care of it), it still serves as an example.

Hopefully the brake sounds won’t annoy you as much as it annoys me, but I bet you’ll notice it. I should compile some clips of cars stopping in movies. It could be the most annoying YouTube video ever!

 

November 4th, 2008 | 4 Comments

The Volvo Chronicles: Solved It!

So this should be the last chapter in the long saga I’ve had in trying to find the missing power in the upper RPM range of my S70. I’ve tried a lot of things, from doing some temporary testing with the downpipe loosened to check for catalytic converter blockage to replacing the compressor bypass valve diaphragm.

In my last post, I mentioned the turbo control valve (TCV) as the next part that I was replacing. For those of you who don’t know, the TCV is a little solenoid that controls the opening of the wastegate. In the case of the Volvo, there is no pressure sensor after the turbo (MAP sensor), and the boost pressure is calculated using the airflow values from the MAF sensor and the engine rotation speed. I believe the target is 0.7 bar, or 10.2 psi.

In order to keep the boost in check, the ECU uses the TCV to force air from the compressor housing into the wastegate actuator, opening up the wastegate. This allows air to bypass the turbine wheel, reducing the rotational speed, and dropping boost. I found a nice diagram of the turbo and associated parts:

The TCV is circled in red. As you can see from the hoses, the TCV simply allows or blocks air from going to the wastegate actuator. Since the air is coming from the turbo, it can be a little dirty, some excess oil from the crankcase ventilation and the turbo itself. This contaminates the solenoid over time, causing it to respond slowly, and sometimes outright fail.

So, if the TCV gets contaminated or fails, it won’t be able to maintain the proper boost levels, causing the performance of the engine to drop. One option is to do away with the TCV all together and put in a manual boost controller, which is basically a spring loaded valve that opens to open the wastegate at a certain pressure. Although you can use this to bypass the ECU’s control of the boost pressure, and potentially increase the boost higher than stock, you run the risk of overboosting and causing damage.

Anyway, I replaced the TCV, and everything is good. Power is strong up until I reach redline, whereas before it was falling flat past around 5,000 rpm. So at last, my search is complete, for now.

One interesting side note is that there used to be an interesting hesitation around 1,500 rpm in 1st gear, when pulling away from a stop. This no longer happens. I cannot figure out why this is, since the turbo is making no boost at this point. I’m certainly not complaining, since I love smoothness and predictible power response, however, perhaps one of you has an idea why this is happening?

October 30th, 2008 | 1 Comment

Here is a Video

Why a video today? We’re swamped in work that has nothing to do with TwoGuysRally :(. So to keep you entertained and amazed, heres a video of Richard Burns flying in Finland:

 

Link for you RSS peeps.

October 29th, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Rally America Rules and Diesels

Rally America gives you a slight advantage if you chose to run a diesel in their Production classes. In order to equalize different cars in a class displacement limits are given, but it is not always the engine’s actual displacement (unless you’re running a 2WD NA car). They calculate it by providing multipliers for certain aspects of a car. A car with AWD is given a 1.3 multiplier, so if you were running a 1999cc NA AWD car your recalulated displacement would be ~2599cc. 

So the multipliers (as of 10/25/08) are:

  • Rotary - 1.8
  • Forced Induction - 1.7
  • AWD - 1.3
  • Single Cam / Pushrod - 0.8
  • Diesel - 0.8 

So Diesel’s get a displacement advantage. So a 2000cc AWD NA diesel car would have about the same adjusted displacement as a 2000cc FWD NA gasoline car (80cc adjusted difference). You may or may not know that diesels tend to make more torque and consume less than their gasoline counterparts. So I wonder why they get the advantage in the rules.

This makes me wonder how a TDI would do in the rally world, especially in the open class (no displacement advantage given). Although I wonder how and if you could do an Anti-Lag system…hrmmm. While I’m thinking take a listen to the most famous diesel race car: Link for you RSS peeps.

 

October 28th, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Powered by WordPress | Blue Weed by Blog Oh! Blog | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS). | Automobile Blogs - Blog Top Sites