<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turbochargers! - Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twoguysrally.com/2008/05/06/turbochargers-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twoguysrally.com/2008/05/06/turbochargers-part-2/</link>
	<description>Two guys on a journey into the Rally Racing world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Two Guys Rally &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Turbochargers! - Part 5</title>
		<link>http://twoguysrally.com/2008/05/06/turbochargers-part-2/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Guys Rally &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Turbochargers! - Part 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysrally.com/?p=43#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>[...] size. And no, bigger isn&#8217;t better. I know I have covered turbo sizing to an extent in the second part, but I feel that there are some things that I have seen recently that I must comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] size. And no, bigger isn&#8217;t better. I know I have covered turbo sizing to an extent in the second part, but I feel that there are some things that I have seen recently that I must comment [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turbochargers! - Part 3 at Two Guys Rally</title>
		<link>http://twoguysrally.com/2008/05/06/turbochargers-part-2/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Turbochargers! - Part 3 at Two Guys Rally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysrally.com/?p=43#comment-208</guid>
		<description>[...] internal combustion engine. If you haven&#8217;t done so already, I recommend reading part one and part two and grabbing a snack before continuing on with this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] internal combustion engine. If you haven&#8217;t done so already, I recommend reading part one and part two and grabbing a snack before continuing on with this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ozimek</title>
		<link>http://twoguysrally.com/2008/05/06/turbochargers-part-2/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ozimek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysrally.com/?p=43#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dustin, I'm glad you think that, because it is exactly what I aim for when I write these technical articles. 

You may have noticed that each successive part is getting more and more in depth. I did that to get people familiar with the subject first, and have basics to refer back to for the next part. 

For the third part, I'm still trying to decide what to write about. Usually I just go with the flow and what makes sense, so most of the article will probably be decided when I write it. You just reminded me of some excellent points though, like how downpipe geometry affects spool time, dispelling the notion that exhaust backpressure doesn't matter on turbocharged cars, why efficiency matters, and so forth. Thanks :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dustin, I&#8217;m glad you think that, because it is exactly what I aim for when I write these technical articles. </p>
<p>You may have noticed that each successive part is getting more and more in depth. I did that to get people familiar with the subject first, and have basics to refer back to for the next part. </p>
<p>For the third part, I&#8217;m still trying to decide what to write about. Usually I just go with the flow and what makes sense, so most of the article will probably be decided when I write it. You just reminded me of some excellent points though, like how downpipe geometry affects spool time, dispelling the notion that exhaust backpressure doesn&#8217;t matter on turbocharged cars, why efficiency matters, and so forth. Thanks :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Tarditi</title>
		<link>http://twoguysrally.com/2008/05/06/turbochargers-part-2/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Tarditi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysrally.com/?p=43#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Good write-up... not too much engineering-speak, but enough to make it technically appealing without being like reading a textbook.

Hopefully, you can discuss some of the other components to a turbocharged system like downpipes, up-pipes, the different basic designs of turbos, bearing types, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good write-up&#8230; not too much engineering-speak, but enough to make it technically appealing without being like reading a textbook.</p>
<p>Hopefully, you can discuss some of the other components to a turbocharged system like downpipes, up-pipes, the different basic designs of turbos, bearing types, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
